Commentary

New research vindicates old practices


 

Dr. Barbieri observed that “numerous advances in the clinical science of obstetrics have expanded the indications for cesarean section.” I would disagree. Rather, research is finally being done that demonstrates the cesarean section rate was appropriate in the mid 1980s—when we were urged to reduce such deliveries significantly. In my opinion, the current cesarean delivery rate of 26.1% is a complete vindication of the practice of obstetrics in that era. As for the need to establish a new rate of 30%: I believe American Ob/Gyns have already voted with their scalpels, making such a goal superfluous.

I also believe the quixotic quest in the 1990s to achieve a 15% cesarean rate is—at least in part— directly responsible for the rise in litigation against Ob/Gyns.

David C. Walters, MD
Mount Vernon, Ill

Recommended Reading

VBAC: When is it safe?
MDedge ObGyn
Pap test every year? Not for every woman
MDedge ObGyn
Putting new guidelines into practice is easier said than done
MDedge ObGyn
EasyROAD—high road or path of least resistance?
MDedge ObGyn
Weekly fluconazole reduces recurrent candidiasis
MDedge ObGyn
Previous SGA or preterm infant increases stillbirth risk
MDedge ObGyn
John Edwards was right to multiply liability
MDedge ObGyn
John Edwards’ case seemed right on target
MDedge ObGyn
Nurses question FHR tracing
MDedge ObGyn
Choosing the best technique for vaginal vault prolapse
MDedge ObGyn