Commentary

Episiotomy: Proper repair prevents fistula


 

To the Editor:

I read with interest Dr. John T. Repke’s article, “When is episiotomy warranted? What the evidence shows” (October 2003). I have been involved in obstetrics and gynecology in private practice in the same area since 1965, and frequently supervise residents at a local teaching hospital. In recent years I have become concerned by the reluctance of many residents to do episiotomies. Often the result is a tear perineally, vaginally, or—worst of all—periurethrally. I have tried to impress on residents that an episiotomy accomplishes some positive outcomes: namely, less stress of pushing by the mother, as well as fewer painful, hard-to-repair tears that can sometimes lead to fistulae.

In my training we were required to perform episiotomy on almost all primiparous patients and many multiparas. I am not sure whether that resulted in less pelvic relaxation, but I do believe it was better for the mother.

All my episiotomies are midline, and I have never had a rectovaginal fistula. If a fourth-degree extension is properly repaired, a fistula should never develop.

ALLAN CLEMENGER, MD
PHOENIX, ARIZ

Recommended Reading

Office evaluation of overactive bladder: 4 easy steps
MDedge ObGyn
Fetal macrosomia: 3 management dilemmas
MDedge ObGyn
Women’s Health: A realistic vaccination program for all patients, including gravidas
MDedge ObGyn
Hormone therapy: For the right patients, benefits outweigh risks
MDedge ObGyn
Letrozole: The treatment profile, the remaining questions
MDedge ObGyn
Did failure to note ureter transection lead to kidney loss?
MDedge ObGyn
Failure to place cerclage blamed for brain damage
MDedge ObGyn
Did antifungal medication cause subdural hematoma?
MDedge ObGyn
Failed D&C follows missed abortion
MDedge ObGyn
Did delayed diagnosis worsen cervical, lung cancer?
MDedge ObGyn