Commentary

Don’t base circumcision decision on statistics


 

As an obstetrician/gynecologist and also a certified mohel (Jewish ritual circumcision ceremony officiant), I often counsel parents and discuss with colleagues the risks and benefits of male newborn circumcision. Ultimately, the matter comes down to a personal decision by parents for their child.

If a baby’s father is not circumcised, I discourage circumcision in the infant. Although documented medical benefits exist, the absolute numbers of adverse outcomes of being uncircumcised are low in the United States. I advise parents to consider the benefit of father and son looking similar (ie, both circumcised or not). As for the psychological impact of circumcision, there are many strong opinions and few data (these usually go together) on all sides. Most parents are concerned about pain. Like ACOG, I support the routine use of analgesia (I give concentrated oral sugar solution along with local anesthetic).

The statistical benefits of this procedure have long been described by Dr. Ed Schoen and the sources cited by Dr. Barbieri. After discussing all relevant factors, I tell parents that, as we know in medicine, statistics do not apply to individuals. Parents whose infant is hospitalized for a urinary tract infection, or later, for a circumcision under general anesthesia for phimosis or other problems, may experience stress not delineated in statistical reports. Therefore, I do not feel the statistics are compelling in either direction.

While the public health impact of routine circumcision can be dramatic, the ability of a country’s health-care system to safely perform this as a routine procedure must be taken into account. Even with my training in public health, I do not feel it is appropriate for physicians in the United States to encourage an individual family to make the decision to circumcise their newborn based on societal benefit. Physicians in Africa face challenges that we do not and must assess the data in their own cultural contexts.

Elizabeth Lyster, MD, MPH
Laguna Beach, Calif

Dr. Barbieri responds:

As the letters from Dr. Jelsema and Dr. Lyster attest, OBG Management readers are highly trained with tremendous breadth and depth of experience and skills. I agree with their counseling suggestions.

Recommended Reading

PGD Calls for Realistic and Vigilant Approach
MDedge ObGyn
Education May Overcome Patient Resistance to Single Embryo Transfer
MDedge ObGyn
Offer Early Genetic Screening, Prompt Disclosure
MDedge ObGyn
Risk of CVD High in Women With Placental Syndromes
MDedge ObGyn
Breast Cancer Risk Tied to Prior Placental Weight
MDedge ObGyn
Advise Pregnant Patients Exercise Is Healthy, Safe
MDedge ObGyn
Resistance After Single-Dose Nevirapine Is Time Related
MDedge ObGyn
Universal Culture-Based Screening Reduces GBS in Term Infants
MDedge ObGyn
Severe Disease in Pregnancy Typical of Hepatitis E Infection
MDedge ObGyn
Data Watch: Live Births That Were Preterm in 2003
MDedge ObGyn