Commentary

Cost is a deterrent to IUD use...Want to increase IUD use? Remove the financial risk


 


“UPDATE ON CONTRACEPTION”
JENNEFER A. RUSSO, MD, AND MITCHELL D. CREININ, MD (AUGUST 2010)

Cost is a deterrent to IUD use

I think the advice offered by Dr. Russo and Dr. Creinin—that we should increase use of the intrauterine device (IUD)—is timely and accurate. The one thing missing from their discussion is any mention of the cost of the devices. The levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNGIUS) (Mirena) recently increased in cost by 40%, placing it out of reach of most patients. It now costs more than most insurance plans reimburse, especially Medicaid. Before this cost increase, I was purchasing and inserting about five units monthly. I am not willing to subsidize the cost of the IUD myself. Of course, one can purchase the identical IUD from Canada at half the cost, if one is willing to risk prosecution by state and federal officials, as well as civil and criminal penalties.

Ronald E. Ainsworth, MD
Paradise, Calif

Want to increase iUd use? Remove the financial risk

I appreciate the concise and informative review of IUD use. However, the authors seem to have missed the 10,000-lb elephant in the room: The current cost to my solo practice for one Mirena LNG-IUS is $820. If I were to insert 10 to 15 of these devices each month, the cash flow required to support this endeavor would quickly run dry. Nor can I afford the financial risk of nonpayment.

The solution to the low utilization rate of IUDs in the United States is simple: Remove the financial risk and make the IUD a pharmacy benefit.

Anthony R. DeSalvo, MD
Warren, Ohio

Dr. Russo and Dr. Creinin respond:
Cost is a barrier to universal IUD access

We appreciate the insightful comments of Dr. Ainsworth and Dr. DeSalvo. Our report focused on decreasing barriers to IUD placement in adolescent and nulliparous patients specifically. Although cost was not an issue we addressed in that report, we recognize that it is a barrier to universal IUD access. Financial pressures are only exacerbated by the recent increases in cost.

In Pittsburgh, where we practice, we have successfully lobbied almost all of our insurance companies to increase their reimbursement rates for IUDs in response to the recent price hikes. We believe that additional IUDs will come to the US market within the next decade, and we hope their availability will alleviate these financial burdens.

Steep price increases by pharmaceutical companies decrease access to their products for those most in need. At the same time, it is important for us as a medical community to be aware of the medical and legal risks of inserting unapproved IUDs.

We want to hear from you! Tell us what you think.

Recommended Reading

ACOG: Use HPV Vaccines for Girls 11-12 Years
MDedge ObGyn
Don't Miss the Diagnosis in Cases of Excess Hair : Women who seek laser hair removal should be screened for systemic disease.
MDedge ObGyn
CDC Guideline Ranks Contraceptives' Efficacy and Risks
MDedge ObGyn
Abuse Factors Predict Postpartum Depression
MDedge ObGyn
Women Smokers at Greater Risk for Urinary Abnormalities
MDedge ObGyn
Start Antibiotics Prior to C-Section Incision : Data show this significantly reduces maternal infections, does not appear to harm newborns.
MDedge ObGyn
Periconceptional Multivitamin Use May Prevent Preterm Birth
MDedge ObGyn
PPT Is Easy to Miss in the Hyperthyroid Phase
MDedge ObGyn
Gestational Diabetes Flags Hypertension Risk
MDedge ObGyn
Maternal Thrombosis and Link to Thrombophilia
MDedge ObGyn