Commentary

A physician who “wins” a malpractice case is still the loser—just less of one


 

“AFRAID OF GETTING SUED? A PLAINTIFF ATTORNEY OFFERS COUNSEL (BUT NO SYMPATHY)” JANELLE YATES (OCTOBER 2009)

The interview with plaintiff attorney Lewis Laska was excellent, although I would quibble with two points. First, it is my belief that no physician has ever “won” a malpractice case. When the verdict is in his (or her) favor, he just loses less. He still pays exorbitant—and probably increased—malpractice insurance fees. He still loses time and income from being away from his practice. And he still suffers the mental anguish that accompanies being sued.

Second, Dr. Laska stated that “[i]nsurance companies never settle unless there is provable liability.” That brings to mind the old adage, “Never say ‘always’ or ‘never’ because there is always an exception.” Most insurance companies know that when you parade a deformed infant in front of a jury, facts will take second place to sympathy. As a result, an insurer may well “play the odds” and settle as the lesser of two evils.

Arthur A. Fleisher II, MD
Northridge, Calif

Recommended Reading

Pregnancy, Breastfeeding May Cut Bone Loss
MDedge ObGyn
Infants Benefit From Maternal Flu Vaccination
MDedge ObGyn
Managing Several Serious Skin Diseases in Expectant Moms
MDedge ObGyn
Gestational Hypertension Risk Up With SDB
MDedge ObGyn
Oral Antihyperglycemic Agents and Diabetes in Pregnancy
MDedge ObGyn
Most Antibacterial Drugs Not Associated With Birth Defects
MDedge ObGyn
Documenting Injuries After a Sexual Assault
MDedge ObGyn
Oophorohysterectomy May Affect Women's Sexual Functioning
MDedge ObGyn
Study: Pelvic Floor Disorders Do Not Affect Sexual Activity
MDedge ObGyn
ACIP Supports Use of Second HPV Vaccine
MDedge ObGyn