When and how to place an autologous rectus fascia pubovaginal sling
Although synthetic midurethral slings remain the standard of care
for most women with stress urinary incontinence, an autologous graft is a
safe and effective alternative
IN THIS ARTICLE
Watch 2 intraoperative videos
These videos were selected by Mickey Karram, MD, and are presented courtesy of the International Academy of Pelvic Surgery (IAPS)
The authors report no financial relationships relevant to this article.
Developed in partnership with International Academy of Pelvic Surgery.
CASE 1: Recurrent SUI and mesh erosion
A 50-year-old woman reports urinary incontinence that is associated with activity and exertion—stress urinary incontinence (SUI)—and says it has worsened over the past year. She mentions that she underwent vaginal hysterectomy, with placement of a tension-free vaginal tape (TVT), about 2 years earlier.
During physical examination, the patient becomes incontinent when abdominal pressure is increased, with some urethral mobility (cotton-swab deflection to 25° from the horizontal). She is also noted to have erosion of the TVT tape into the vaginal lumen.
Urodynamic testing reveals easily demonstrable SUI at a volume of 150 mL when she is in the sitting position, with a Valsalva leak-point pressure of 55 cm H2O. Her bladder remains stable to a capacity of 520 mL. Cystoscopy yields unremarkable findings.
When she is offered surgical correction of her SUI, the patient expresses a preference for the use of her own tissues and says she does not want to have synthetic mesh placed.
Is this patient a candidate for a rectus fascia pubovaginal sling?