To Name :
To Email :
From Name :
From Email :
Comments :

Clinical Reviews

Managing preterm birth to lower the risk of cerebral palsy

Think past hypoxia to the interactions of infection, inflammation, pPROM, and white matter disease

April 2008 · Vol. 20, No. 04


The author reports no financial relationships relevant to this article.

  • Intrapartum hypoxia, once considered an important cause of cerebral palsy (CP), is responsible for only 8% to 10% of cases.
  • Increasingly, evidence suggests that the primary cause of CP lies in the relationship among intrauterine infection and inflammation, preterm labor, preterm premature rupture of membranes (pPROM), and neonatal white matter disease.
  • This review focuses on that relationship and its implications for managing preterm birth with intact membranes or pPROM.

Do you agree with the author?

Tell us what you think!

Click here to submit a letter to the editor

Cerebral palsy is a complex disease characterized by aberrant control of movement or posture that results from an insult to the developing central nervous system (CNS). In addition to motor abnormalities, some patients have seizures, cognitive impairment, and extrapyramidal abnormalities.

Clinical and epidemiologic evidence points to white matter lesions and severe intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH)—detected by neonatal neurosonography—as the key determinants of CP. The lesions are the sonographic antecedent or counterpart of periventricular leukomalacia (PVL), a cerebral lesion characterized by foci of necrosis in the white matter near the ventricles (FIGURE).

The principal risk factor is prematurity

A precise cause for CP has not been identified in more than 75% of cases. The leading identifiable risk factor is prematurity. The prevalence of CP at 3 years of age is 4.4% among infants born earlier than 27 weeks of gestation, compared with 0.06% among babies born at term.1

FIGURE Periventricular leukomalacia

Four axial magnetic resonance images of the brain of an infant show the usual appearance of this cerebral lesion, characterized by foci of necrosis of white matter near the ventricles.

How inflammation leads to premature birth

Any condition that increases the incidence of prematurity can be expected to increase the incidence of CP. More than 80% of premature births follow preterm labor or pPROM. Clinical and experimental evidence suggests that most of these births reflect one or more of four major pathogenic processes, which lead to uterine contractions and cervical changes, with or without premature rupture of membranes2:

  • local or systemic inflammatory immune response
  • activation of the maternal or fetal hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis
  • decidual hemorrhage (abruption)
  • pathologic distention of the uterus.

Two or more of these processes often occur simultaneously, ultimately converging on a final common biochemical pathway that leads to degradation of the extracellular matrix in the cervix and fetal membranes and activation of the uterine myometrium. This process leads in turn to cervical dilation, rupture of membranes, and uterine contractions.

The “inflammatory pathway” is activated in most cases of spontaneous preterm labor and pPROM. As many as 50% of women with preterm labor and intact membranes have histologic chorioamnionitis; the rate is even higher in pPROM. The incidence of chorioamnionitis increases with decreasing gestational age.

Invading microorganisms in gestational tissues often cause intrauterine inflammation and preterm birth. Highly sensitive molecular techniques detect bacteria in the amniotic fluid of as many as half of patients with preterm labor with intact membranes3 and even more women with pPROM. As with chorioamnionitis, the lower the gestational age, the higher the bacterial isolation rates—45% at 23 to 26 weeks compared with 17% at 27 to 30 weeks.4 The microorganisms isolated are often those colonizing the vagina—most commonly anaerobes, gram-negative rods, Gardnerella vaginalis, group B streptococci, Mycoplasma hominis, and Ureaplasma urealyticum.

Infection doesn’t always lead to inflammation

Bacterial products—particularly endotoxin, a major constituent of gram-negative bacteria—bind to a specific pattern-recognition receptor, known as a toll-like receptor, on cell surfaces. This activates innate immunity and stimulates a proinflammatory immune response. Endotoxin is a potent stimulant for proinflammatory cytokines such as interleukin (IL)-1 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, which promote the release of chemoattractant cytokines such as IL-6 and IL-8. Different white blood cells migrate into the inflamed tissue and become activated at the same time.

The uterine cavity is thought to be sterile, and microorganisms there are universally associated with inflammation. Recent studies challenge this assumption. One found bacteria in as many as 90% of endometrial samples from nonpregnant women, but histologic endometritis in only 40%.5 Another noted bacteria in as many as 80% of gestational tissues delivered electively by cesarean section at term or before 32 weeks because of preeclampsia, but histologic assessment showed no or minimal inflammation.6

Why don’t all women develop inflammation?

A critical question is why some pregnant women with microbial invasion of gestational tissues develop inflammation, whereas others do not. Susceptibility depends, in part, on the pathogenicity and amount of invading bacteria. Endotoxin-containing gram-negative bacteria elicit an especially potent inflammatory response. The strength of the response correlates with the amount of endotoxin-containing bacteria in the environment.7

The isolation rate of bacteria from the intrauterine cavity is higher in women with bacterial vaginosis (BV), a condition characterized by malodorous vaginal discharge, vaginal pH higher than 4.5, and a shift from a Lactobacilli-dominant vaginal flora toward predominance of G vaginalis, anaerobic bacteria, and M hominis. The greater number of bacteria may account, in part, for a twofold greater risk of preterm delivery among women diagnosed with BV during pregnancy.8

Genetics may also play a role. Intrauterine inflammation and morbidity are partly influenced by common variations (polymorphisms) in immunoregulatory genes. Preliminary evidence suggests that some women who carry a variant of the TNF-α gene can mount an exaggerated immune response to BV-related organisms (hyper-responders),9 increasing their risk of preterm delivery.10

Inflammation alone is a risk factor for CP

Growing evidence suggests that intrauterine inflammation increases the risk of neonatal white matter disease and subsequent development of CP beyond the risk conferred by gestational age at birth. The relative risk (RR) for CP in preterm infants born after intrauterine infection and inflammation or inflammation alone is 1.9 and 1.6, respectively.11

The association between inflammation, neonatal white matter disease, and CP is strongest in fetuses with funisitis and a plasma IL-6 level greater than 11 ng/mL12—a condition known as fetal inflammatory response syndrome (FIRS). FIRS is also associated with other sequelae of prematurity, including bronchopulmonary dysplasia, respiratory distress syndrome, and myocardial dysfunction.

Can we diagnose subacute inflammation and infection?

Diagnosing and treating intrauterine inflammation promptly may decrease the risk of CP. No single sign, symptom, or test accurately predicts intrauterine infection and inflammation in the pregnant patient. Maternal signs and symptoms such as fundal tenderness, tachycardia, and fever, along with laboratory findings such as an elevated C-reactive protein level and an elevated white blood cell (WBC) count in peripheral blood, indicate overt chorioamnionitis and systemic maternal infection. However, these tests are not especially useful for diagnosing subacute intrauterine infection and inflammation in patients with preterm labor and intact membranes or pPROM. Some authorities advocate amniocentesis for these patients.

Cerebral palsy: Key preventive measures reflect disease origins

  • Prematurity is the leading risk factor for cerebral palsy (CP)
  • Subacute intrauterine infection and inflammation are common causes of preterm delivery
  • Intrauterine inflammation may lower the threshold at which hypoxia becomes neurotoxic in the fetus
  • No single sign, symptom, or test accurately predicts intrauterine infection and inflammation in the pregnant patient
  • A biophysical profile (BPP) score of 7 or lower predicts infection-related neonatal outcomes better than any single component of the BPP
  • In a pregnancy complicated by pPROM, adjunctive antibiotics prolong pregnancy for as long as 10 days, but do not affect neonatal neurologic outcome
  • Adjunctive antibiotics have no proven benefit in managing preterm labor with intact membranes
  • Screening for and treating bacterial vaginosis during pregnancy are not useful
  • Prophylactic antibiotic treatment during the periconceptional period has no proven benefit
  • A single course of antenatal steroids in preterm labor with intact membranes or pPROM significantly decreases neonatal mortality and neurologic morbidity without raising the risk of neonatal sepsis—even in the presence of intrauterine infection
  • Tocolysis with magnesium sulfate or a calcium-channel blocker to stop preterm labor with intact membranes may decrease neurologic morbidity in neonates
  • Consider delivery after 32 weeks if fetal lung maturity is confirmed because 1) expectant management of pPROM beyond 32 completed weeks of gestation does not have a clear benefit and 2) intrauterine inflammation associated with white matter disease is common in pPROM

A positive bacterial culture or gram-stained slide of amniotic fluid confirms intra-amniotic infection but detects fewer than 50% of cases. Other diagnostic criteria, such as an elevated WBC count, high level of lactate dehydrogenase activity, high protein level, and low glucose concentration in amniotic fluid, are more sensitive, but nonspecific, for amniotic infection and inflammation.

Elevated inflammatory cytokines such as IL-6 in amniotic fluid and fetal blood have been associated with intrauterine inflammation and neonatal white matter disease in women with preterm labor and intact membranes or pPROM, but they are not significantly more accurate than the previously mentioned biomarkers.13,14 An amniotic fluid pocket may not be accessible by the abdominal approach in most patients with pPROM because of significant oligohydramnios. Testing amniotic fluid from the vagina is an alternative. Low glucose in vaginal samples is a specific, but not a sensitive, marker for intra-amniotic infection.15

Using the BPP. The biophysical profile has been used to identify fetuses at risk of FIRS in the presence of pPROM. Oligohydramnios—especially when the largest vertical amniotic fluid pocket is smaller than 1 cm—and diminished fetal breathing and body movement are associated with chorioamnionitis and suspected or proven neonatal sepsis. A nonreactive nonstress test is specific but not sensitive.

Although each component of the BPP provides useful information, a BPP score of 7 or lower predicts infection-related outcome much better than any single finding. In a population with an infection-related outcome of 30%, a BPP score of 7 or lower within 24 hours of delivery had a positive predictive value of 95% and a negative predictive value of 97%.16 A retrospective case-control study found that women who were followed with daily BPP and delivered within 24 hours after a BPP score of 7 or lower on two examinations 2 hours apart had a lower rate of neonatal sepsis than women who were managed expectantly or had a single amniocentesis on admission to the hospital.17

How management tactics affect neurologic outcome

Options for women in preterm labor with intact membranes or pPROM include antibiotics, antenatal steroids, tocolytics, or early delivery.

Antibiotics in cases of pPROM only

The findings of two large clinical trials powerful enough to evaluate adjunctive antibiotics in women with pPROM are in agreement: Such treatment prolongs the pregnancy briefly (as long as 10 days).18,19

NICHD-MFMU study. In a trial conducted by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal–Fetal Medicine Units (NICHD-MFMU) Research Network, 48 hours of intravenous therapy with ampicillin and erythromycin followed by 5 days of oral amoxicillin and enteric-coated erythromycin given to 614 women between 24 and 32 weeks’ gestation decreased the number of infants who died or suffered a major morbidity, including respiratory distress syndrome, early sepsis, severe IVH, or severe necrotizing enterocolitis.18

ORACLE I. The results of the larger ORACLE I trial, which included 4,826 women, were less impressive.19 Patients who developed pPROM before 37 weeks’ gestation received erythromycin, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, or both, or placebo for up to 10 days. Although antibiotic therapy prolonged pregnancy briefly, it did not have a major impact on neonatal mortality or any major morbidity, including cerebral abnormality on ultrasonography (US). In contrast to the NICHD-MFMU Research Network study, treatment with oral amoxicillin-clavulanic acid increased the risk of necrotizing enterocolitis.

ORACLE II. The ORACLE II trial evaluated the benefit of adjunctive antibiotics for 6,295 women in spontaneous preterm labor before 37 weeks’ gestation who had intact membranes and no evidence of clinical infection.20 The women received erythromycin, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, or both, or placebo for as long as 10 days. Compared with placebo, none of the antibiotics was associated with a lower rate of the composite primary outcome, which included major cerebral abnormality on US before discharge from the hospital.

Did you miss this content?
Endometriosis: Expert answers to 7 crucial questions on diagnosis