To Name :
To Email :
From Name :
From Email :
Comments :

Clinical Reviews


What you need to know about medication safety in pregnancy

Few drugs are major teratogens, but heightened vigilance is crucial to protect your pregnant patient

November 2007 · Vol. 19, No. 11

IN THIS ARTICLE

The author reports no financial relationships relevant to this article.

Fifty years ago, the thalidomide experience—a high incidence of major birth defects following prenatal use of the drug—made clear the devastating potential of drug exposure during pregnancy. Since that disaster, healthcare providers and patients have adopted a conservative approach to medication use during pregnancy, especially during the first trimester and lactation. That is a wise strategy, although very few medications are associated with abnormal fetal development.

In this article, I’ll guide you through some of the issues that must be considered when assessing a drug’s teratogenicity, help you find information on a host of medications, and familiarize you with some of the challenges involved in counseling the patient. I also present a table listing the adverse effects known to be associated with selected drugs during the first, second, and third trimesters and lactation (TABLE). We are fortunate that a large body of information about medication use during pregnancy and lactation is readily available on the Web and in books and medical journals. This information is far from definitive, however, because much of the evidence concerning prescribed drugs is anecdotal or presented with insufficient warning about their use during pregnancy and lactation.

A discussion of these issues with the patient will help set the risks and benefits of a particular drug into proper perspective, alleviate fears, and improve compliance. Nonprescription medications should also be discussed, and the patient should be advised that we have very little data concerning their use during pregnancy.

Assignment of risk is an uncertain science

Major structural defects are apparent at birth in about 3% of all pregnancies and in about 4.5% of all children by the age of 5 years.1 A cause or proposed mechanism for the defects can be determined in fewer than 50% of these cases. Nor can we count on expert consensus about the safety of many medications during pregnancy because it rarely occurs and, in some cases, may be impossible to achieve.

Animal studies are the means of assessing the teratogenicity of most drugs. Animals commonly used to study fetal effects include rodents (fertility, birth defects, birth weight, behavior), rabbits (birth defects), baboons (uterine blood flow), and sheep (uterine blood flow, cardiovascular effects, fetal hypoxia, and acidosis). Dosages are often much higher (in relation to body weight or surface area) to “test the systems” for any possible reproductive harm. Although these studies may be helpful, they do not reliably predict the human response.

Even when humans are the subject of study, conclusions must be viewed with caution. To determine the risk of teratogenesis, it is necessary to know the stage of development during which the exposure occurred, as well as the identity and dose of the medication and the genetic susceptibility of the mother and fetus.

Three critical stages. In utero exposure to a drug occurs in one of three periods of fetal development:

  • ovum – from fertilization to implantation
  • embryo – from the second through the eighth week of gestation
  • fetus – from the eighth completed week until delivery.

An “all-or-none” effect (i.e., spontaneous abortion or not) is believed to arise from exposure during the first period, but the embryo stage is the most critical time because it involves organogenesis. Detrimental effects may occur even beyond this period as cells continue to divide in the hematologic, reproductive, and central nervous systems.

Many fine points of exposure are difficult to clarify

Retrospective and uncontrolled studies, as well as individual case reports or small series, may overestimate the risk to the fetus of exposure to a specific drug or combination of medications. Case reports do not establish causation.

It can also be difficult to differentiate between the risks of a specific drug and the hazards of maternal illness to explain an unfavorable outcome. For example, is a particular case of stillbirth the result of fetal exposure to enoxaparin or maternal thrombophilia, or both? Can fetal growth restriction be attributed to use of azathioprine during pregnancy or to the mother’s underlying illness? And so on.

In addition, it is necessary to distinguish between a defect’s natural prevalence—i.e., the rate at which it occurs in a population—and the additional risk posed by exposure to a particular drug. Studies in large populations are needed—but usually unattainable—to determine the relative risk from specific potential teratogens.

Finally, it is very difficult to assess neurobehavioral effects of in utero exposure to centrally acting drugs beyond the immediate neonatal period. The dose, offspring’s age and gender, and behavioral test system must all be considered.

Few drugs are implicated in restricting fetal growth or reducing organ size. We also lack consistent information about long-term effects such as learning or behavioral problems (i.e., functional teratogenesis) that may result from chronic prenatal exposure to a certain medication.

Why FDA pregnancy categories have to go

In 1979, the Food and Drug Administration created five pregnancy risk categories to be used by manufacturers to rate their products in the drug formulary for use during pregnancy: categories A, B, C, D, and X, which range from no evidence of damage to the fetus (category A) to clear teratogenicity (D and X).

The D rating is generally reserved for drugs with no safer alternatives, such as secobarbital, doxycycline, and lorazepam. The X rating means there is absolutely no reason to risk using the drug in pregnancy, as in the case of oral contraceptives, benzodiazepines, and misoprostol.

Approximately 2% of drugs fall into category A, 50% in category B, 38% in category C, 3–5% in category D, and 1–5% in category X.3 These categories do not often accurately reflect the available information on risk to the fetus. A major initiative is under way to declare these categories obsolete and provide more informative drug labeling. Pregnancy labels of the future will likely address three important areas:

  • clinical considerations–issues relevant to prescription of a particular drug in pregnancy, including the risk of disease versus no treatment. Also included will be information of use when counseling a patient whose fetus was inadvertently exposed to a medication in early gestation
  • summary risk assessment–a narrative text that describes, as comprehensively as possible, the risk of exposure based on animal and human data
  • data to support the assessment.

All drugs cross the placenta

Most medications are easily absorbed during pregnancy, and serum concentrations of albumin for drug binding are lower than in the nonpregnant state. Pharmacokinetic changes during pregnancy include:

  • higher volume of distribution
  • lower maximum plasma concentration
  • lower steady-state serum concentration
  • shorter plasma half-life
  • higher clearance rate.1

The small spatial configuration and high lipid solubility of most medications permit easy transfer of an unbound drug or its metabolite across the placenta or into breast milk. Virtually all drugs and their end products cross the placenta, with unbound concentrations of the drug in the fetal serum similar to the level in maternal serum—sometimes even higher (FIGURE).

A few drugs with high molecular weight do not cross the placenta in significant amounts (e.g., glyburide, interferon, thyroid supplements, insulin).

FIGURE An elaborate nutrient (and drug) delivery system

The placenta and umbilical cord deliver the nutrients and oxygen the fetus needs for normal growth—as well as most medications used by the mother.

Medication use tends to increase as pregnancy progresses

The drugs most commonly taken during pregnancy include vitamins, iron preparations, calcium, analgesics, antibiotics, and antacids. Excluding vitamins and mineral supplements, an average of one to two medications are taken during gestation. Over-the-counter formulations account for about half of these drugs, with acetaminophen being the single most commonly used medication during pregnancy. Antibiotics are the most widely prescribed drugs.

Although caffeine, tobacco, alcohol, and illicit substance use tends to diminish as pregnancy progresses, medications are usually taken at the same frequency or more often during gestation.

My colleagues and I found a significantly higher mean number of medications (3.3 and 4.1, respectively) used during the second and third trimesters of gestation than were taken before pregnancy (2.6).2

How to counsel the patient

Counseling a woman before or during pregnancy about the continuation or initiation of a medication should take place in an open, supportive, and informative manner. Most inquiries relate to exposures involving very low levels of relative and absolute risk.

A detailed fetal ultrasonographic examination is often used to accurately date the pregnancy and, if possible, screen for any structural defects. The patient should be advised that first-trimester screening, chorionic villus sampling, maternal serum quadruple screening, amniocentesis, and fetal blood sampling are not very predictive of a drug’s fetal effects. Exceptions may be the observation of open neural tube defects (approximate 1% risk associated with valproic acid and carbamazepine) by maternal serum quadruple screening and facial clefting by targeted ultrasonography.

When a patient inquires about a particular drug, it is important to gather the following information:

  • When did she take the medication?
  • Why did she take it?
  • For how long did she take the medication?
  • Did she take other medications, or any substances of abuse, at the same time?

A number of sources of information about potential teratogens are available.3-5 These include national computerized databases that are accessible on the Web:

The last source (OTIS) consolidates teratology information nationwide and reports it by state or region. It also publishes a host of fact sheets on various drugs that may be useful to dispense to the patient during counseling. In addition, many teratogen information services or poison control centers (often at children’s hospitals) are available throughout the United States to serve specific geographic areas. And teratogen registries at pharmaceutical companies may provide limited information about newer medications.

The Physician’s Desk Reference (PDR) is a common source of information about the use of prescription drugs in pregnancy.3 But be aware that, to avoid liability, pharmaceutical manufacturers do not encourage use of their drugs during pregnancy unless the benefit clearly outweighs the risk. It would be unrealistic for them to market a medication for specific use during pregnancy because it would require considerable time and cost, and raise ethical objections, to conduct research in a vulnerable population that is limited in number.

Effects of agents used more than 40 years ago were reported by the Collaborative Perinatal Project or the Boston Collaborative Drug Surveillance Program.6 Those findings are often inconclusive, reflect bias in study designs, and do not help a clinician evaluate current medications or those less commonly prescribed during pregnancy.

The risks and experience associated with new drugs are usually not well explored in regard to pregnancy. As a result, older medications are more likely to be prescribed as maintenance therapy during gestation for the simple reason that they have a larger body of information regarding their effects. These older drugs may no longer be preferred once the patient delivers.

Most drugs are not teratogens

The TABLE lists adverse effects in the human fetus known to arise from exposure to specific drugs. The information comes largely from the Reprotox database, which was reviewed as recently as 2006, describes human data only, and is reported by first trimester (anomalies, abortion) and the second and third trimesters (fetal growth restriction, stillbirth, low birth weight, preterm delivery, immediate neonatal problems).7 Typical dosages of most drugs are not anticipated to increase the risk of congenital anomalies.

Most human data come from small series or case reports. Although these types of studies are helpful, they tend to be biased or reflect the pregnancy’s background risk of birth defects rather than the risk posed by a specific drug. In addition, case reports of malformation after prenatal exposure to a certain drug may involve exposures to other agents and a lack of uniformity of abnormalities, making the association between adverse effects and a single agent unlikely. Dissimilarities in the dosage and route of delivery also limit interpretation. for example, short-term intravenous or sublingual administration of a drug may pose a different risk than taking that medication orally or vaginally, in a lower dose, for a longer period, or at a different period of gestation.

Continued...
Did you miss this content?
Does a family history of both breast and prostate cancer (vs breast only) put a woman at greater risk for future breast cancer?