The enigma of chronic pelvic pain: Systematically tracing the cause
Is the pain due to endometriosis? Pelvic inflammatory disease? Psychosomatic factors? The search for an answer is aided by consensus guidelines, key data, and an expert’s clinical experience.
- If thorough investigation yields no diagnosis or indications for immediate surgery, empiric medical therapy for endometriosis is appropriate without laparoscopic confirmation. If empiric medical therapy fails, proceed to diagnostic laparoscopy.
- Referral to a multidisciplinary pain clinic has been shown to be more effective than episodic gynecologic management of patients, especially those with significant psychological issues.
- Schedule regular follow-ups. Do not instruct patients to call only during a pain crisis—this practice may create pain behaviors directed at obtaining sympathy and dramatic medical attention.
One woman complains of daily pain that worsens premenstrually. Another reports frequent aches radiating through her lower back and abdomen. A third says intercourse exacerbates her pain. And the list goes on.
Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) can manifest in dozens of ways, and the words patients use to describe it vary just as widely. Its multifaceted nature poses one of the biggest challenges to accurate diagnosis and appropriate management. Success is most likely when a compassionate attitude is combined with a systematic assessment to identify and understand the underlying cause—a blend of artful practice and scientific reasoning.
This article draws from consensus guidelines, other data, and personal experience to describe the components of careful diagnosis of this common but elusive condition.
10% of gynecology visits
CPP, which refers to pelvic pain of more than 6 months’ duration, accounts for roughly 10% of a gynecologist’s outpatient encounters, as well as many invasive procedures. For example, 1 in 5 gynecologic laparoscopies and 15% to 20% of hysterectomies are performed solely or in part for CPP.1,2
Noncyclic pelvic pain is not necessarily gynecologic
CPP is not always of gynecologic origin, even though the patient may perceive the pain as emanating from the reproductive organs. Because of this, careful evaluation is needed to distinguish gynecologic pain from CPP caused by orthopedic, gastrointestinal (GI), urologic, or neurologic conditions, or CPP that has a psychosomatic basis.
Purely cyclic uterine pain, which is referred to as dysmenorrhea, is usually characterized as primary or secondary. Although dysmenorrhea is frequently chronic and is an important clinical problem, this review focuses on noncyclic pelvic pain.
The relationship between CPP and underlying gynecologic pathology is often enigmatic. Many clinicians attribute the pain to psychological causes before completing a thorough assessment. An example of the hazards inherent in such an attitude is primary dysmenorrhea: Before the primary role of prostaglandins was elucidated, this form of dysmenorrhea was thought to be largely psychosomatic. As a result, it went untreated.
The TABLE lists major gynecologic and nongynecologic causes of noncyclic CPP. Endometriosis is the most common gynecologic condition associated with CPP.
Causes of noncyclic chronic pelvic pain
Chronic pelvic inflammatory disease
Rapid ovarian capsule distension
Ovarian remnant syndrome
Recurrent hemorrhagic ovarian cysts
Uterine myomas (under certain circumstances)
Uterine retroversion (if associated with other intraperitoneal pathology or dyspareunia)
Pelvic congestion syndrome
Irritable bowel syndrome
Inflammatory bowel disease
Partial bowel obstruction
Musculoskeletal (eg, low back pain)
Questions to elicit useful clues
The patient’s description of the location and pattern of pain, as well as history, are invaluable clues.
10 key questions. To elicit the most useful information from the patient, it may be necessary to ask numerous specifically phrased questions, such as:
- What is the the exact location of yourpain?
- What is the quality of the pain (sharp? dull?)
- Does it radiate, or spread, to other areas of the body? If so, where?
- How many times have you experienced this pain?
- How long does each episode last?
- How intense is each episode?
- What makes the pain worse? What makes it feel better?
- Does the pain change with your menstrual cycle (or with bowel movements, urination, sexual intercourse, or physical activity)?
- How much, and how, does the pain interfere with your daily activities?
- How would you rate the severity of the pain on a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 = no pain and 10 = the worst pain imaginable?
A complete medication history, especially of pain medication, is important.
Medical history should include information about nongynecologic conditions that may account for CPP, such as irritable bowel syndrome, ulcerative colitis, Crohn disease, and interstitial cystitis.
Pending compensation or litigation issues should be recognized and addressed.
Patient’s depiction of pain may lead to source
Understanding the anatomy of the nerves that transmit pain can facilitate interpretation of patient reports. It may explain, for example, why GI pathology can cause the perception of gynecologic pain. See “The anatomy of pelvic pain perception”.
- Pain relieved by defecation as well as irregular defecation patterns lasting at least 3 months suggest irritable bowel syndrome.
- Urinary urgency, frequency, nocturia, and pelvic pain may point to early interstitial cystitis.
- In multiparous women, pelvic pain that worsens premenstrually and with fatigue, standing, and sexual intercourse indicates possible pelvic congestion syndrome. Venographic studies may document pelvic vein varicosities in such cases.
The anatomy of pelvic pain perception
Convergence of sensation
Somatic pain. Painful impulses originating in the skin, muscles, bones, joints, and parietal peritoneum travel in somatic nerve fibers.
Visceral pain. Painful impulses originating in the internal organs travel in visceral nerves.
Visceral pain is more diffusely localized than somatic pain and has a less well-defined area of projection to the sensory cortex of the brain for its identification. Also, there are many more somatic neurons than viscerosomatic ones in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord.
These differences result in a convergence of sensation that may be difficult for the patient and physician to interpret. Visceral pain is usually interpreted as coming from the skin and other surface tissues, which are supplied by the corresponding spinal cord segment, resulting in referred pain. For example, the initial pain of appendicitis is perceived to be in the epigastric area, because both are innervated by the thoracic cord segments T8, T9, and T10.
Since innervation of the lower intestinal tract is the same as that of the uterus and fallopian tubes, patients may experience pain caused by GI pathology as gynecologic pain.
Pain sensitivity of genital tissues
- External genitalia are exquisitely sensitive.
- Vaginal pain sensation is variable.
- The cervix is relatively insensitive to small biopsies but is sensitive to deep incision or to dilatation.
- The uterus is very sensitive.
- The ovaries are insensitive to many stimuli, but they are sensitive to rapid distension of the ovarian capsule and compression during physical examination.
Reproduce the pain on physical examination
Examination should be conducted in a way that does not provoke involuntary guarding, which may obscure findings. Gaining trust beforehand is important, as is taking time to explain what will be done during the exam.
Ask the patient to show you where the pain occurs, if possible, and try to reproduce the pain by palpation. Look for abdominal distension, and locate any tender areas. Continue the pelvic examination in this way, always attempting to reproduce and localize the pain. Look for any tenderness, nodularity (especially in the cul-de-sac), and palpable masses in the cul-de-sac or adnexal regions.
Examine the abdominal wall for evidence of myofascial trigger points and for iliohypogastric (T12, L1), ilioinguinal (T12, L1), or genitofemoral (L1, L2) nerve entrapment. Then ask the patient to tense the abdominal muscles by performing a straight-leg–raising maneuver or a partial sit-up. Points that are still tender, more tender, or that reproduce the patient’s pain after these maneuvers should be injected with 2 to 3 mL of 2.5% bupivacaine. Chronic abdominal wall pain is confirmed if the pain level is reduced by at least 50%.
Chronic low back pain without abdominal pain is seldom of gynecologic origin. If there is evidence of musculoskeletal disease, consider consulting an orthopedist. Neuromuscular symptoms may be accompanied by a pelvic mass. Positive neurologic signs such as muscle weakness or abnormal reflexes should prompt consultation. In such cases, surgical exploration may reveal a neuroma or bony tumor.
Lab, imaging studies: How useful?
Traditional laboratory studies are of limited value, although a complete blood cell count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and urinalysis should be obtained. The ESR is nonspecific and will be elevated in any type of inflammatory condition, such as subacute salpingo-oophoritis, tuberculosis, or inflammatory bowel disease.
A thorough genitourinary evaluation is important, including cystoscopy when suspicion of urinary tract disease is high. If no obvious cause for the pain is uncovered, pelvic ultrasonography may be helpful. This is especially true in an obese or uncooperative patient, when bimanual pelvic examination is difficult.
If bowel or urinary signs and symptoms are present, then an endoscopy, abdominal and pelvic computed tomography, cystoscopy, or computed tomography urogram may be useful.
No diagnosis, no reason for surgery? Start therapy for endometriosis
If the workup yields no diagnosis and rules out indications for surgery, such as significant adnexal mass, then empiric medical therapy for endometriosis is appropriate without laparoscopic confirmation.1
Begin a trial of empiric therapy with a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug such as ibuprofen or naproxen, oral contraceptives, or both.1 Women with ovarian pathology (eg, periovarian adhesions, recurrent functional cyst formation) and those whose pain worsens midcycle, premenstrually, or menstrually may experience improvement with a trial of oral contraceptives to suppress ovulation and menstruation.
Use second-line empiric therapy before diagnostic laparoscopy
If these treatments fail, begin empiric therapy with second-line agents such as danazol, progestins, or gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists. Laparoscopic confirmation is unnecessary.
Several publications, including a 2002 consensus statement on management of chronic pelvic pain and endometriosis, support this approach.1,3-5 In fact, following recent guidelines for evaluating and treating CPP is likely to lead to fewer invasive procedures for diagnosis and treatment, including laparoscopy and hysterectomy.
Surgical ablative therapy has not been shown superior to medical therapy in addressing the pain of early-stage endometriosis. Medical therapy is less invasive and, as the following report illustrates, it probably treats all disease present.
In a study of 95 women with CPP in whom endometriosis was suspected after a thorough noninvasive workup yielded no diagnosis, investigators found that empiric therapy with depot leuprolide for 12 weeks provided significant pain relief compared with both the baseline and a placebo group (P ≤ .001 for both comparisons). Posttreatment diagnostic laparoscopy confirmed endometriosis in more than three quarters of both treatment groups.3
The limits of laparoscopy
Although second-line empiric therapy is controversial, laparoscopy is invasive and does not necessarily yield a definitive diagnosis. However, diagnostic laparoscopy may ultimately be indicated in patients with pain of undetermined cause. Perform laparoscopy only if no cause of pain can be identified and confirmed, and after reasonable trials of empiric medical therapy.
Up to one third of women have no pathology visualized on laparoscopy.6 This does not mean that no pathology is present. Endometriosis is missed visually during laparoscopy in up to one third of CPP patients in whom the disease is proven on biopsy.3,4
Laparoscopically identified pathology does not necessarily make the diagnosis. For example, the size and location of endometriotic implants do not always correlate with the presence of pain. Thus, endometriosis may be present but may not be the cause of CPP.1 Similarly, visualizing pelvic adhesions during laparoscopy does not necessarily mean that the adhesions are responsible for the pelvic pain, as women with extensive adhesions are sometimes asymptomatic.7
Gynecologic conditions identifiable by diagnostic laparoscopy
The following gynecologic conditions may be identified through diagnostic laparoscopy in women with cyclic and noncyclic pain:
Endometriosis is seen in at least one third to one half of women with CPP7; most sites of endometriosis are in the pelvic area. The mechanisms by which endometriosis causes pain are not fully understood, however.
Chronic pelvic inflammatory disease (PID). Laparoscopy identifies adhesions or stigmata of chronic PID in about 25% of women with CPP. Chronic PID may cause noncyclic CPP because recurrent exacerbations frequently result in hydrosalpinges and adhesions between the tubes, ovaries, and intestinal structures. Before ascribing symptoms to adhesions, however, clinicians should specifically note this pathology in the area of pain.