Advertisement

Obg Management Logo Home
   
   
Free CME
Classifieds
Register/Login
Home Page Current Issue Past Issues Supplements Podcasts Information for Authors
                                    
   
About Us
Subscribe Renew
Reprints Permissions
Advertising Information
Links and Resources
Classifieds

Advertisement

June 2007 · Vol. 19, No. 06

Reducing the medicolegal risk
of vacuum extraction

Focus on indications, informed consent, technique, and documentation to yield better outcomes


Fast Track

If the fetal heart rate is reassuring, the second stage of labor need not be limited to 2 or 3 hours

Reserve vacuum extraction for fetuses at more than 34 weeks’ gestation because of the increased risk of intracranial hemorrhage associated with prematurity

Vacuum extraction can be performed comfortably in the absence of regional anesthesia

The incidence of shoulder dystocia with vacuum extraction is 3.5%, compared with 1.5% for forceps delivery

Once full vacuum is achieved, encourage the mother to push with the next contraction, and apply steady traction in concert with her efforts

If vacuum extraction fails, do not switch to the forceps; the risk of intracranial hemorrhage is greatest when the 2 methods are combined

The vacuum cup will “pop off” if it is applied incorrectly, if traction is excessive or applied in the wrong direction, or if cephalopelvic disproportion is present

IN THIS ARTICLE

Martin  L.  Gimovsky,  MD;

Program Director, Newark Beth Israel Medical Center, Newark, NJ, and Clinical Professor of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women’s Health, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY

Ji-Soo  Han,  MD

Senior Resident in Obstetrics and Gynecology, Newark Beth Israel Medical Center, Newark, NJ

Sign in now to read more...

Back to top


Advertisement



Advertisement1


XMLRSS callout
 

Advertisement