Advertisement

Obg Management Logo Home
   
   
Free CME
Classifieds
Register/Login
Home Page Current Issue Past Issues Supplements Podcasts Information for Authors
                                    
   
About Us
Subscribe Renew
Reprints Permissions
Advertising Information
Links and Resources
Classifieds

Advertisement

September 2005 · Vol. 17, No. 9

4 Cases of Faulty Follow-Up:
Cutting the legal risk of breast cancer screening

Inadequate follow-up is usually at the root of lawsuits that allege missed or late diagnosis


Fast Track

3 red flags

  • young woman

  • self-discovered mass

  • negative mammogram

#1 reason for claims of misdiagnosis: “Physical findings failed to impress the physician”

An ObGyn may be responsible as the “default PCP” for screening for colorectal, skin, and other cancers

IN THIS ARTICLE

Samuel  Zylstra,  MD, MPH

Chairman, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Assistant Professor, University of Massachusetts, Milford Regional Medical Center  Milford, Mass

Linda  Greenwald,  RN, MS

Editor, Risk Management Publications, Risk Management Department, ProMutual Group, Boston

Maureen  Mondor,  RN

Vice President, Risk Management Department, ProMutual Group, Boston

Breast cancer is the number 1 most frequently misdiagnosed condition in malpractice claims, and failure to perform adequate and timely follow-up is often at the root of these cases.

This article considers lessons to be learned from 4 malpractice cases involving allegations of inadequate follow-up and misdiagnosis of breast cancer. We focus on specific red flags, and a “systems approach” to adequate follow-up of breast screening findings and patient complaints. We focus on these questions:

Sign in now to read more...

Back to top


Advertisement



Advertisement1


XMLRSS callout
 

Advertisement