Advertisement

Obg Management Logo Home
   
   
Free CME
Classifieds
Register/Login
Home Page Current Issue Past Issues Supplements Podcasts Information for Authors
                                    
   
About Us
Subscribe Renew
Reprints Permissions
Advertising Information
Links and Resources
Classifieds

Advertisement

April 2005 · Vol. 17, No. 4

SURGICAL TECHNIQUES

Anal sphincter injury at childbirth

Immediate or delayed repair? Overlapping or end-to-end technique? Midline or mediolateral episiotomy? Plus: risk factors, and tactics for subsequent deliveries.


IN THIS ARTICLE

Fast Track

Most rectovaginal fistulae occur when physicians fail to recognize the true extent of sphincter injury at the time of repair

Use the episiotomy technique most familiar to you, advises a Cochrane review

Immediate repair of perineal injury is better than delayed repair, to help reduce bleeding and pain

No randomized studies suggest that primary overlap is better than primary end-to-end technique

When to consider vaginal delivery

  • Asymptomatic patient

  • No evidence of anal sphincter defects by endoanal scan or low pressures on manometry

  • Experienced midwife or doctor

Ruwan  J.  Fernando,  MS, MRCOG

Specialist Registrar in Obstetrics & Gynecology, Leeds General Infirmary,
Leeds, United Kingdom

There is a crisis of confidence in vaginal delivery. Women are aware of the potential for devastating consequences, and many ask for elective cesarean solely to avoid any possibility of incontinence or other problems linked to vaginal delivery.

Many obstetricians also have misgivings, though they are well aware that a cesarean is far more likely to cause maternal morbidity.1 In a survey of female obstetricians, 31% chose elective cesarean as their preferred mode of delivery—80% of whom gave fear of perineal trauma as their reason.2

Sign in now to read more...

Back to top


Advertisement



Advertisement1


XMLRSS callout
 

Advertisement