Advertisement

Obg Management Logo Home
   
   
Free CME
Classifieds
Register/Login
Home Page Current Issue Past Issues Supplements Podcasts Information for Authors
                                    
   
About Us
Subscribe Renew
Reprints Permissions
Advertising Information
Links and Resources
Classifieds

Advertisement

June 2002 · Vol. 14, No. 6

UPDATE

BV update: eliminating diagnostic confusion

In the absence of universally accepted data, 3 leading authorities review the evidence on bacterial vaginosis and discuss their approaches to diagnosing and treating this common vaginal affliction.


SEBASTIAN  FARO,  MD, PhD; WILLIAM  LEDGER,  MD; SHARON  HILLIER,  PhD

The panelists

William Ledger, MD, is chairman emeritus and professor of OBG at the New York Weill Cornell Medical Center in New York City.



Sharon Hillier, PhD, is professor of OBG and reproductive sciences at the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine in Pennsylvania.



Sebastian Faro, MD, PhD, is clinical professor of OBG and reproductive sciences at the University of Texas-Houston Health Science Center in Houston.

Key points

  • Physicians should not diagnose BV with a culture. A standard culture will not identify the number of anaerobic bacteria.

  • In diagnosing BV, an Ob/Gyn must perform a microscopic exam, along with a whiff test and pH.

  • Metronidazole and clindamycin are only 66% effective in treating BV.

  • Topical clindamycin causes a temporary overgrowth of E. coli and Enterococcus in the vagina.

  • Women whose vaginal microflora is colonized with hydrogen peroxide-producing Lactobacillus are less likely to acquire BV.

  • All women should be screened for BV during an annual exam.

The number one reason women visit their gynecologists is for the treatment of vaginal infections. Yet a recent Gallup survey found that only 36% had ever heard of bacterial vaginosis (BV), the most common type of vaginal infection, affecting 1 in 4 American women. BV is a disease caused by an overgrowth of anaerobic bacteria and Gardnerella, all of which can be found in low numbers in the healthy vagina. In fact, women who have been diagnosed with BV have up to 1,000 times more anaerobic bacteria than normal women.

Studies have shown that many women confuse the symptoms of BV with a yeast infection and often self-medicate with over-the-counter preparations. Unlike Candida, however, BV has been associated with pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), as well as an increased risk of endometritis, cervicitis, and in pregnant women, premature delivery. Therefore, it is imperative that Ob/Gyns properly diagnose and treat BV while creating greater awareness of the signs and symptoms of this widespread disorder among their patients. Here, Sebastian Faro, MD, PhD, William Ledger, MD, and Sharon Hillier, PhD, respond to OBG Management editors’ questions on appropriate diagnosis, screening, and management modalities to combat this potentially dangerous yet treatable condition.

Sign in now to read more...

Back to top


Advertisement



ADVERTISEMENT   

ADVERTISEMENT   
ADVERTISEMENT   
Subscribe to our e-mail alert. We'll notify you of upcoming articles every month—and send you links to them before they are published.

Changing your e-mail address?
 
INSTANT POLL
What nonhormonal menopause interventions have you found to be effective?

ADVERTISEMENT